Re: Answering all Mark Morin's 'Concerns'

On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 22:19:49 -0500, Mark D Morin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>On Thu,  6 Nov 2003 03:40:03 +0100 (CET), Nomen Nescio
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I am going to try to respond to all Mark Morin's concerns.  First,
>>the idea there can be only one key with an address is false.
>>All that really matters is that a post is signed and you know who
>>has the ability to sign it (which should be only one person unless
>>someone did not guarded their private key -- which is unlikely).
>>One page on Brad's web site ( the mypubKey2.htm ) shows he
>>indeed claims the digital key used to sign the 'Brad' post _AND_
>>that he has the ability to sign with it.
>>
>>The idea of cut and paste forgery is just incorrect.  Each post that
>>is signed gets info. about he content that was signed in the signature
>>itself.  When you use the pgp software to verify a signature, IF the
>>contents between the signing comment lines have been changed, the
>>content will not come up as validly signed.
>
>
>oh, those were not all of my concerns. You stated that your "program"
>has been reviewed.  You provided two URLs as to where it was listed.
>Where are the reviews?

Apparently in the same place Brad keeps the rest of his lies.  I thought
by now you would know to actually check and see if Brad's claims have
any fact to them.


--
Taylor

Hammer of Thor, September 2002