Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Sci Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: The sixth Porat postulate



Bjoern Feuerbacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> "Y.Porat" wrote:
> > 
> > Bjoern Feuerbacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > "Y.Porat" wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > just above you said it is right,
> > > > so nothing can be saied about
> > > > something that is right.
> > >
> > > Non sequitur. From "I (Bjoern) think that it is right", it does
> > > not follow "no one can have anything against it". Why on earth
> > > do you think so?
> > ------------
> > because you are a 'suprime judge' that knows anything
> > with absolute self confidence.
> 
> ----------
 i answered that article long and in detail
 i set on it i think more than half an houer, so i have no 
energy to repeat it all
it was somehow sabotaged?)
i will just summ up my bottom lines:
--
the virtual particle theory has *too many degrees of freedom
and on the other side too little proven experimental probabilites.
:
too mant degrees of freedom i mean for instance alowing
many masses for the virtual particles in addition to 
*not alowing any mass* for them wich is physics nonses.
the assumption that the photon has no mass is another
nonsense physics.- even the 'establishment physicist' alow now 
(with a big 'crechtz'(:-) an upper limmit of a possible mass
for the photon.

the W was 'found in an experiment that has nothing to do
with the nucleid natural conditions:
(a tremendous artificial  energy  level) with a probability
of 1 to a few billions to find it
moreover: ignoring all the too many garbage particles that are
acompaning that exdperimant and 'miraculously' are overlooked
iow with such conditions you can find there with the same 
sucess, your mother in law edas well.

i suggest instead to examine my idea about the Circlon:
a very basic particle that might explain *any attraction force*
the 'trick' of that particle and innovation of it is in that:
*it moves *naturally* in a closed circle*

last practical advice to Fuerbacher and others:
go quickly to all your exoeriment institutes and tell them 
that acording to the 'trivial' sixth Porat postulate, 
once you are dealing with virtual particles-
*you are waisting your precious time and money*

i supose that money is not too much in your concern-
someone elese is paying and you get your nice salery

but may be *waist of time* might ligh on your concience.

and may be a much better selfish motivation:
may be someone else elsewere in the world, abandoned that nonsense
and soon will leave you behind......)(turn your eayes to the east..)

all the best
Y.porat
-------------



<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.