
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
> >My point is this. There is Stephen Hawking, Michio Kaku and a >few others who are the preeminent physicists on the public stage >today, and they often seem to be confusing some of the issues >regarding wormholes and hyperspace. Hyperspace, was discovered >in the 1800's and called Hilbert space, because it was discovered >by Hilbert. If you examine this link, you can learn >the entire history of the very beginnings of relativity and >hyperspace. > >http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Hilbert.html > Here are some of the flws in the current theories of wormholes and hyperspace that I often hear on talk shows and have read in books etc. Firstly, we know, that if you rip a hole in space time, the temerature in hyperspace, void of EM waves, would be absolute 0. At absolute 0, all molecular activity stops. People do not appear to be thinking deeply on the subject of what heat is. Heat, is the vibrational interaction of atoms being bombarded by EM waves. Light waves for instance from the sun, hit the atoms of the earth, maybe your atoms, and they vibrate from the collision, and that is heat. Remove the EM waves, make a hole in space-time, and no EM waves, no heat whatsoever. All activity, comes to a halt. So how could you travel through absolute 0? Well, maybe you could shield a craft, but more likely, you do not go there with your atoms, instead, you merely change the vibrational frequency of the elements of your craft, to match the vibrational frequencies of the elements of your destination and voila, you appear in that dimension. Now this is not metaphysics. The elements are defined, by their frequencies. That is how when we peer into space, we knw what elements exist out there, on the EM spectrum. The red shift, and all that. The cesium clock, and all that. Chemistry as well, uses the elements and combines them, but they work with weights and measures, and not usually with vibrational frequencies, however, as many know, there is wide discrepency between physics and chemistry, and this is because, physics, does not have the correct values of the elements. They have the values as found by experiment on earth. This might not seem like a big deal, but it often results in things such as failed equipment and lost space vehicles sent to places like Mars. You will find, that Avagrado's number is wrong. And if you had the correct Avagrado's number, then you would find that the current values of such things as the electron are also wrong. Not in the way in which they are used in experiment today here on earth, but if you want to apply them to the fabric of space-time, you need the absolute values. And although people brag today, about numbers being calculated to 8 or 10 decimals, in fact, there are no decimals in the real values, the real values are exact. And at that point, chemistry does come in line with physics. How far are we away from that point in our physics today? Who knows. There are probably people in research laboratories such as the Skunk Works, who have those values. No stargate could operate on close numeric values. The values would have to be the exact values or else you could not balance the forces, or arrive at your destination. The wormhole would be unstable, and you would get too much heat and you would not reach your proper destination. You could not even steer an electro gravitic craft, without knowing the exact values. It would be too unstable to steer or control. Amazingly enough, once you know these values, the universe opens up and you see exactly how all the forces are related, how gas pressure is just like EM pressure, how weight is just like f=ma, and how all these things add up to a coherent system in a beautiful symphony. Even sound vibration reflects the underpinnings of reality, in the same way that octaves, and harmonies play against each other. Of course these things are all related, as they are all made of the same stuff, and wave theory applies to all forms of energy and all wave types. So the huge page long calculus formulas do reduce down to simple beautiful formulas like E=mc2. Without the need for 10 dimensional super strings. Not that the theory doesn't have some merit, but it hasn't convinced me yet, that it is better than a proper understanding of relativity.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |