
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Alfred Einstead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (WaiteDavid137) wrote: > > It would be a bad term if they did. > > It's entirely appropriate and the understanding behind it is fairly > standard, centering on the equation of geodesic deviation: waite has the impression that "tidal force" is not defined as you and I have described it. He believes that tidal forces are defined accordining to differences in coordinate acceleration, the existance of such differences are, in general, coordinate dependant. This definition, of course, is untrue. The rising and falling of ocean tides can't arise from changes in coordinate systems and that is where "tidal force" gets its name. If there is no relative acceleration of free-test particles in a free-fall frame then there are no tidal accelerations in any frame. Hence the reason the Riemann tensor is also called the relativistic tidal force tensor. Pmb
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |