
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Yes, decoherence grew of of quantum optics, but the application of decoherence to the measurement problem was done by Bohm, Everett, deWitt, Zurek and others. Cheers, Michael C Price ---------------------------------------- http://mcp.longevity-report.com http://www.hedweb.com/manworld.htm "Arnold Neumaier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > michaelprice wrote: > > > > Arnold Neumaier: > > > > > But then Everett has nothing to offer beyond what is already in > > > decoherence theory. The latter explains the measurement process > > > without having to introduce relative states that branch every moment > > > a measurement is made (which is a rather vague concept). > > > > Wrong way around. Decoherence theories grew out of Everett's work. > > See what Zurek has to say about the subject. > > The decoherence principle (except perhaps for the name) is just > the rotationg wave approximation. It comes from quantum optics, where > it was developped completely independent from Everett. > > Everett's relative states and observers are not needed at all to make > sense of decoherence. It happens without any observer, and needs no > branching of anything. Thus one can skip the confusing many-worlds > part without any loss of substance. > > Arnold Neumaier
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |