Re: c = constant

"Brian Kennelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Androcles wrote:
> > "Brian Kennelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >> And, as I posted before,
> >>light does not obey the vector law, so under your definition, it does
> >>not obey the PoR.
> >
> > Prove it.
> > I've presented data and model to show it does.
> > Quit making assertions and prove it.
>
> Light speed transforms as c/N+v(1-1/N^2) where the vector law would be
> c/N+v when changing to a moving reference system.  This composition law
> for light agrees with Einstein's, but not with the parallelogram law.
> It has been verified by astronomical observations,
Vague, not a proof.

and by terrestrial  experiment, most famously by Fizeau.

Water in a tube has a near zero velocity at the tube wall, and is not
uniform throughout the cross section; it is faster at the centre. Fizeau
didn't know that.

Androcles, still waiting for a proof.