Re: The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics

Harry wrote:

> G. Builder, Ether and Relativity, Aust. J. Phys. 1958, Vol. 11, p279-297.
>
> His ether paper convinced me. He published it after the debate in Nature on
> the implications of the clock paradox had calmed down. Builder was to be
> taken seriously concerning this topic, for example he was the first or one
> of the first to extend SRT to accelerated systems -see "The Resolution of
> the Clock Paradox", Aust. j. Phys. 1957,10, p.246 and same in Amer. J.
> Phys.1959, 27, p.656. )
>
> I promised to Bilge to explain his ether paper to the group, and will make a
> start by typing here below the summary of "Ether and Relativity", which
> makes at least the subject matter clear.
>
> Harald
>
>
> Ether and Relativity, G. Builder (Aust. J. Phys. 1958, Vol. 11, p279-297)
> -----------------------------------
> Summary.
> The relative retardation of clocks, predicted by the restricted theory of
> relativity, demands our recognition of the causal significance of absolute
> velocities. 
Is this statement assumed or proven in the paper?





-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----==  Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----