
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Sanjay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi Friends, > > I just read an article that Fuel Cells generation through Solar Energy > have double efficiency. Earlier the conversion was 18% efficient. New > technique makes it 30% efficient. > > You can read Complete article here. > > http://www.softtanks.com/Article/showitem.php?ridx=89&uid=1 > > > 30% efficient Solar conversion have been attained for fuel cell. This > is about a Double efficiency attained in Solar energy Conversion for > Fuel Cell energy. It will need 2-5 years for commercialization of this > technique. > > Using the fuel Cells we will not only have better environment but We > will be getting pure unlimited Solar energy without investing large > amount of money in Fusion Plants. > > Bye > Sanjay. > > Full Article at : > > http://www.softtanks.com/Article/showitem.php?ridx=89&uid=1 This article makes no sense and is typical of the popular press bull crap surrounding hydrogen and other complicated technical issues. It talks of raising the temp of the water to 600 C with light then using electricity to convert the water to H2. It talks of the electrical portion of "light particles " and the heat portion of light. This is a funny way to look at light. I would like to see any body raise the temperature of anything to 600 deg C, never mind extracting any energy from it, with an efficiency of 30%. That temperature from sun light will require focused optics with solar tracking and will be very prone to energy loss by convection and radiation. I think this is another hydrogen hype article without basis. Bob
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |