Re: Need general information on "Cold Fusion"

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, tini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Schultz is a schmuck and just as bigotted in his way as those espousing the
: weird and wacky theories of cold fusion.  Just cuz you have more science' on
: your side of the argument doesn't mean you have to be unpleasantly rude to
: people who would like to come to the conclusion on their own.

I have no problem with people coming to the conclusion on their own.  I
do have a problem with people who lie about the facts in order to influence
others' decisions.  I have a bigger problem with people who tell lies even
after they have been repeatedly reminded what the truth is.  There comes
a point beyond which there is no longer anything to be gained by failing
to be blunt.  You passed that point when you top-posted, by the way.

-----
Richard Schultz                              [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
". . .Mr Schutz [sic] acts like a functional electro-terrorist who 
impeads [sic] scientific communications with his too oft-silliness."
   -- Mitchell Swartz, sci.physics.fusion article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>