Re: Need general information on "Cold Fusion"

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Schultz) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, JohnnyCJohnny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Schultz) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>  
> :> :> : Cold Fusion seemed rather dead during the late 1990s and now seems to
> :> :> : be on the rebound with Mitsubishi and the U.S. Navy both concluding
>                                      ^^^^^^^^^
> :> :> : that Cold Fusion is real through their experimentation. . .
>  
> :> :> The truth of this matter has been explained to you in detail several 
> :> :> times.  Are you a liar or an idiot (or both)?
>  
> :> : Neither.  The TRUTH depends upon what sources you accept as credible
> :> : and which you don't.  
>  
> :> And the TRUTH is that the U.S. Navy *never* concluded that Cold Fusion
> :> is real.  As has been pointed out to you, *one* research group in *one*
> :> laboratory at a U.S. Naval Research facility concluded that Cold Fusion
> :> is real.  Their opinions are not those of the U.S. Navy.
>  
> : OK, fair enough.  In any case I was just directing him to information,
> : so he can draw his own conclusions.
> 
> And if he has been paying attention, he will come to the conclusion that 
> you are either a liar or intellectually challenged or both.

Well take that chip off your should and sit down.  He can draw his own
conclusions about Cold Fusion upon reading the literature that's
available in the public domain.  I was not trying to convince him of
anything.

> 
> -----
> Richard Schultz                              [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
> Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
> -----
> ". . .Mr Schutz [sic] acts like a functional electro-terrorist who 
> impeads [sic] scientific communications with his too oft-silliness."
>    -- Mitchell Swartz, sci.physics.fusion article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>