Re: Dynamic magnetic field is open

Dear Sergey,

I read your paper, but....I am very sorry to bring you bad news.In my
opinion it's all wrong, horribly wrong. I urge you to withdraw your paper
from Internet.
I have no problem with your introduction; also not with your equations and
not even with your experiments.
But I noticed a big misunderstanding with the application of the equations.

In short:

1. The induction according to standard theory is not related to the change
of B vector at the wire, but to the change of enclosed flux, that is, to the
total amount of change of field lines inside the enclosed area.

2. When you go from an infinitely small area loop to a closed wire that you
measure at each end you change the configuration into something different
from what you think. In fact you create a loop of which one part is that
piece of wire and the rest is your measurement system that closes the loop.

All in all, as far as I can see you measured nothing unusual, some of your
results I foresaw before reaching your data, and most or all other results
are easy to explain.


I propose to discuss details by personal email.


Sincerely,
Harald


"Sergey Karavashkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> We published a new paper
>
> " Several experiments studying dynamic magnetic field "
>
> in our journal "SELF Transactions", volume 3 (2003), issue 1
>
> *Abstract*
>
> We substantiate three sets of experiments studying EM induction,
> describe and present their results. These experiments corroborate that
> the lines of force of dynamic magnetic field are open, as well as that
> the phenomenology of process of mutual induction is true if based on
> the direct interaction of parallel sections of primary and secondary
> loops. Additional theoretical calculations on the basis of this
> phenomenology well coincide with the experimental results.
>
> Please enjoy reading full text:
>
> http://angelfire.lycos.com/la3/selftrans/v3_1/contents3.html#b
>
> I hope, it will be interesting for many of you, and look forward to
> hear your opinion.
>
> Sergey.