Re: Isn't this better described as 'aether'?

Snipped heading (We know who we are)

>
> [EL]
> Hi Paul,
> You are very welcome to discuss anything you wish with me. :)
> I happen to be fond of people who have the courage to say NO.
>
> EL

OK...  Here goes..  But first I'll see if we are starting from
a common knowledge base...

And ask for latitude due to my primary field being electrical
engineering and not physics so my verbiage may at times require
clarification...  So question any aspect or usage....

So...  I follow the premise that there was indeed a BB at some
point in the past.. date of which is still in question....

(side note: there's a TV show on about the guy that takes
   pictures of groups of naked people and there's lots of
   naked women pointing dark round points at me so I'm
   distracted)

While I suck at math I do consider it a valued and generally
correct tool to describe the observed universe but it is limited
in its ability to mathematically model reality by the knowledge
base of the mathematicians...  And that any mathematical model
is only a description of observable reality and is not the reality
itself...   ( that may need clarification even to me)

I think that matter and energy are convertible one into the other...

I think man know far less about the universe around him than he
knows he knows...

And I really do understand the standard model on a general level
including GR,SR,QM,String and know quite well  the theories
of the micro and macro regions...  not the detailed mathematical
details but the overview consideration that each paper on the subject
speaks of..    Most of the standard positions I agree with some
I question .....

So for the sake of the discussion lets see if we start with
some base line construct of a BB universe that had an
inflationary period followed by a long expansion period
,which we are still in today...

Which begs the question of the Singularity or better the Nature
of the singularity....  And that's where my postulate starts so
lets see where you can tear apart that stuff before I give you
the postulate to fry......


Paul