Re: Isn't this better described as 'aether'?

"EL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Laurent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...


EL...   ( And Laurent if you about this thread)

I long time ago I tried to explain a postulate I had and
I don't think I ever was able to describe it in a way that
was understandable but at some point I would like to give
it another shot with you two.  I have followed your guys
post and have a good deal of respect for your intellectual
abilities and would like to get some trashing of the construct
of my  postulate ( Quantum Point, Quantum State, variability
of c, ect.) by logical mental faculties...

So drop a note if you are up for showing me the error of
my knowledge base and logic form...


Paul R. Mays
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Some where within the Quantum State
Http://Paul.Mays.Com/story.html
http://paul.mays.com/mayday.html
http://paul.mays.com/rainy.html

"Science tries to answer the question: 'How?' How do
cells act in the body? How do you design an airplane
that will fly faster than sound? How is a molecule of
insulin constructed? Religion, by contrast, tries to
answer the question: 'Why?' Why was man created?
Why ought I to tell the truth? Why must there be sorrow
or pain or death? Science attempts to analyze how
things and people and animals behave; it has no concern
whether this behavior is good or bad, is purposeful or
not. But religion is precisely the quest for such
answers: whether an act is right or wrong, good or bad,
and why."
                                            - Warren Weaver (1894~1978)