
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Baruch Vainas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "William" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > > "Baruch Vainas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > > > At least I quote the stuff I attack. > > You don't like the taste of your own medicine, I see. You said, > "Deleted but addressed". (from your post, 2003-10-23). You need a new dictionary, "attacked" != "addressed". And that was a different context. You said I had deleted something and hadn't addressed it, I pointed out that in directly addressing something else, I had also covered that minor point as well. Big difference between deleting something and then referring to the missing material as junk, and deleting something that wasn't a central point but acknowledging that it wasn't ignored. -Wm
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |