
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Sci Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: Uncle Al's verdant countergenius
- __From__: DarkMatter
- __Subject__: Re: Uncle Al's verdant countergenius
- __Date__: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:02:01 -0500
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 08:52:12 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gave us:
>>"hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>The ACLU has been on the side of Ku Klux Klan in the past. The argue very
>>strongly for their beliefs of the constitution. I don't find them consistent
>>but they do.
>>
>There was a time when I found them consistent, but not anymore.
>Consistency, for an organization which professess to defend
>principles, means that you stand for the principle, no matter who
>benefits. When your position on a principle depends on who may
>benefit, you're no longer consistent, just partisan.
At last, you are absolutely correct.
Then there's that sig thing.
- Re: Uncle Al's verdant countergenius, (continued)
- Re: Uncle Al's verdant countergenius,
DarkMatter
- Re: Uncle Al's verdant countergenius,
h.E.
- Re: Uncle Al's verdant countergenius,
Richard Henry
- Re: Uncle Al's verdant countergenius,
Bill Vajk
- Re: Uncle Al's verdant countergenius,
Gordon D. Pusch
- Re: Uncle Al's verdant countergenius,
DarkMatter
- Re: ACLU,
Parallax
- Re: Uncle Al's verdant countergenius,
DarkMatter
- Re: Uncle Al's verdant countergenius,
meron
- Re: Uncle Al's verdant genius,
Robert J. Kolker
- Re: Uncle Al's verdant countergenius,
DarkMatter
- Re: Uncle Al's verdant countergenius,
h.E.
- Re: Uncle Al's verdant countergenius,
meron
- ACLU,
Bill Vajk
- Re: ACLU,
meron
- Re: ACLU,
donald j haarmann