Re: Uncle Al's verdant countergenius

Richard Henry wrote:
> "h.E." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> > "DarkMatter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> > > On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:57:03 -0500, "h.E." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gave
> > > us:

> > > > which means it's not illegal after all

> > >  No, dipshit.  It means that it is the same as the Florida election
> > > polls.  A manipulated crock, care of our republican twits at the top.

> > In the US, a court decision *defines* what is legal.  Did you go to public
> > school?

> Thank goodness we never have had any crooked judges.


That makes little to no difference most of the time.

'It is the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the 
law is.' Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 177 (1803).

Unless it is charged, a case actually brought, and proven, that
a judge abused his discretion, the verdict stands as the law
of the land. We have unethical and immoral decisions every day,
that's nothing new.