Re: Uncle Al's verdant countergenius

On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 19:54:14 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gave us:

>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, DarkMatter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>On 24 Sep 2003 07:09:19 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul
>>Cardinale) Gave us:
>>
>>>One doesn't need to wonder at all.  The ACLU wants to keep Davis, and
>>>believing that he would have a better chance in March, they will use
>>>any tactic at all to try to postpone the election.  In short, the ACLU
>>>is scum.
>>
>>
>>  Actually, dipshit, the election IS illegal, because it was based on
>>illegally obtained,
>
>Proof?

  Yeah... that's it... keep those blinders on tightly, dumbass.
>
>> as well as invalid signatures.
>
>Proof?

  See above.

>
>> THEN, the republicans had the court ruling on that put aside,
>>
>>  Actually, YOU are scum.
>
>Actually, I'll second what Paul wrote above.  I'm deeply disappointed 
>with ACLU here.  Their claim to fame used to be pursuit of principles, 
>regardles of partisan issues.  I could agree with them at times, 
>disagree at other times, but as long as they stuck to the above, I 
>respected them.  Not anymore.  A principle pursued selectively is no 
>principle anymore.


  You should examine your sig again, closely.