Re: Proof of God's existence? Why not evolution?

In talk.origins, "Mark Earnest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>"Doug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>in reply to...
>
>> > If anyone has, it is you for making inaccurate
>> > and illogical statements about his 'hypocrisy' when you
>> > are preaching logic and scientific accuracy.
>>
>>
>> Maybe you are new to alt.religion (if you are posting from here), but
>> almost every theist starts a discussion with "god can not be understood".
>> Yet they continue by making ludicrous statements that would require
>> intimate knowledge of god.
>>
>> e.g. "God exists outside of time". You can only know this if you
>understand
>> god.
>>
>> [Saying god can not be understood, and then making declarative statements
>> about god is hypocrisy].
>
>I never have said that.  But I will admit that God is difficult to
>understand.
>
>>
>> When an atheist attempts to make any conclusion about god the response is
>> swift, "Your oppinon is worthless because you can not understand god".
>> However theists can get away with saying anything (most of the time
>> contradicting each other) because they are some how endowed with more
>> knowledge about a supposedly unintelligible being, then non-believers.
>>
>> So, yes, mark is a hypocrite. Unless he admits that his statements about
>> god are no more valid then mine.
>
>I'm sure you have valid knowledge about God.  Everyone does.
>
>>
>> Otherwise he should not be making any conclusions about god, since he is
>> supposed to be beyond human understanding.
>
>There's lots known about God; and lots unknown.

Please identify three facts about God and the supporting evidence for
these facts.