Re: Proof of God's existence?

"Mark Earnest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > That's called an argument from ignorance ... you cannot comprehend how
it
> > could happen, so you invent a god to explain it.
>
> Structures do not happen by themselves, they require a constructionist.
> Man is a structure.
> What else does it take for you to realize the ultra obvious?

The only obvious thing is your argument from ignorance.

What is the difference between a structure and a non-structure?
What is the scientific criteria for a structure?

Who says they always need a constructionist?

You can get a perfect cone shape (structure) by pouring sand on the ground.
All it takes is gravity.

What does it take for you to think beyond your religious delusions?