Re: Proof of God's existence?

"Mark Earnest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 

> 
> "Doug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> "Mark Earnest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>>
>> >
>> > "Doug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> "Mark Earnest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
>> >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > "Doug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> >> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> "Mark Earnest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
>> >> >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >> [snip]
>> >>
>>
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> They are not god, and I am not god. We just do what is right
>> >> >> >> and compassionate because it is the right thing to do.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Maybe you shold stop hating humanity so much and consider
>> >> >> >> that our good works are actually a product of human love and
>> >> >> >> compassion.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I don't hate man, I just know that every human tends to hurt
>> >> >> > me, and God tends to help me.  I have never known anything
>> >> >> > different.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> But perhaps those people helping you are just that, humans.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If you project the help you received to an imaginary being,
>> >> >> rather then giving those good people the credit they deserve,
>> >> >> you are insulting their character.
>> >> >
>> >> > That is based on the assumption that there is no God, which I
>> >> > personally do not accept.  I encounter God in spirit and in the
>> >> > flesh every day, so I for one know he exists.
>> >>
>> >> So do you assume that all good acts and sacrifices are a product
>> >> of god
>> > not
>> >> humanity?
>> >
>> > Ultimately.
>>
>> That's too bad. I think you are not giving enough credit to humanity.
>>
>> >
>> >> >
>> >> > That is my testimony, of what I have seen and heard.
>> >> > Such is enough to send a man to prison in a court.
>> >>
>> >> I am not sure I understand the meaning or relevance of this.
>> >
>> > That means that if I tell you that I have seen God, and explain to
>> > you how I know that this is true, you have the responsibility of
>> > seeing what I am saying until you know that it is true, and see the
>> > same thing.
>> >
>> > Your only recourse if you were determined to oppose me, is to prove
>> > that I am not telling the truth, and am trying to deceive you.
>> >
>> > That is the nature of testimony.
>>
>> Fair enough.
>>
>> And if you wish for others to accept your beliefs or interpretations
>> you have the B.o.P. to demonstrate the validity of your statements.
> 
> I have given you evidence, and apparently, even as most people do not,
> you do not recognize evidence when you see it.

Your claims are hearsay. 

There is no substatiation to your oppinons. Nothing you have said is 
evidence, only wild claims without true direction or objective 
interpretation.

> 
> Don't ever be a court lawyer.

I don't plan to be.

But perhaps you should not be the one to even make such a statement, since 
you do not know what substantiates objective evidence.

Your case would be thrown out of court before it even made it to the press.