Re: Proof of God's existence?

"Keynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 21:09:47 GMT, "naked ape" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> >
> >"Doug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> "Tarald Andresen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >>
> >> >> > > By the way ....... you cannot "prove" god by using philosophical
> >> >> > arguments.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > That's your opinion.
> >> >>
> >> >> That's reality!
> >> >
> >> > Nope.
> >> >
> >>
> >> A philosophical argument is not proof, as proof is defined as something
> >> tangible or mathematical.
> >>
> >> Philosophers have been trying to "prove" god for thousands of years.
None
> >> have succeded.
> >>
> >> That is support for Zen's position.
> >
> >Yes, you're right. With religions, one only has to first believe it to
see
> >it. In Science, you have to first see it to believe it. ..  Ape;)
> >
>
> Oh yeah.  That explains the 11 dimensional string theory alright.

Which is not actually a scientific theory - since there is no evidence to
support or disprove it.
There are also a vast number of scientists who laugh at that hypothesis.