Re: Proof of God's existence?

"Mark Earnest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Doug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "Mark Earnest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >
> > >
> > > "Doug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> "Mark Earnest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> > >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > "Doug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > >> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> >> "Mark Earnest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> > >> >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > >> >>
> > >>
> > >> [snip]
> > >>
> >
> >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >> They are not god, and I am not god. We just do what is right
> > >> >> >> and compassionate because it is the right thing to do.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Maybe you shold stop hating humanity so much and consider that
> > >> >> >> our good works are actually a product of human love and
> > >> >> >> compassion.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > I don't hate man, I just know that every human tends to hurt me,
> > >> >> > and God tends to help me.  I have never known anything
> > >> >> > different.

Since you invent the god, the attributes of that god, and even the
connections to that god - your conclusions are meaningless.

> > >> >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> But perhaps those people helping you are just that, humans.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> If you project the help you received to an imaginary being, rather
> > >> >> then giving those good people the credit they deserve, you are
> > >> >> insulting their character.
> > >> >
> > >> > That is based on the assumption that there is no God, which I
> > >> > personally do not accept.  I encounter God in spirit and in the
> > >> > flesh every day, so I for one know he exists.

What you personally accept is meaningless.
You know no such thing. you BELIEVE .. and you discolor everything you see
based on that fanatical belief.



> > >>
> > >> So do you assume that all good acts and sacrifices are a product of
> > >> god
> > > not
> > >> humanity?
> > >
> > > Ultimately.
> >
> > That's too bad. I think you are not giving enough credit to humanity.
> >
> > >
> > >> >
> > >> > That is my testimony, of what I have seen and heard.
> > >> > Such is enough to send a man to prison in a court.

No. It isn't.
Even testimony given in conjunction to a KNOWN EVENT is arguable.
Testimony, when there is no known event, ...is meaningless.
Try going to a police station and telling them I murdered someone.
The FIRST thing they do, if anything at all, is look for supportive
evidence!



> > >>
> > >> I am not sure I understand the meaning or relevance of this.
> > >
> > > That means that if I tell you that I have seen God, and explain to you
> > > how I know that this is true, you have the responsibility of seeing
> > > what I am saying until you know that it is true, and see the same
> > > thing.

What?
You're full of bull!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If YOU claim you've seen soiomehtnig, and wish have it be accepted as fact,
YOU hve to provide vaalid and supportive evien ce for your calim.

That YOU accept it means NOTING ... and others most certainly do NOT have to
based their lives just takinig your word for it!

Your arrogance is exceeded only by your ignorance!



> > >
> > > Your only recourse if you were determined to oppose me, is to prove
> > > that I am not telling the truth, and am trying to deceive you.
> > >
> > > That is the nature of testimony.
> >
> > Fair enough.
> >
> > And if you wish for others to accept your beliefs or interpretations you
> > have the B.o.P. to demonstrate the validity of your statements.
>
> I have given you evidence, and apparently, even as most people do not, you
> do not recognize evidence when you see it.

You have given NO evidence - only claims from ignorance.



>
> Don't ever be a court lawyer.

??????????????/
Obviously you don't even have the faintest idea what constitutes proof and
evidence.
Any lawyer, prosecutor, judge or jury would lagh you out of court!



> >
>
>