
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"John Ings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 12:10:00 -0800, "Not so quick" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >If I believe/have reason to think that we may have > >been put here by an advanced species or something > >like that, but don't accept the traditional account of > >creation, what does that make me?, a non-deist-creationist? > > Whether you believe it was an advanced civilization or a deity, > you a creationist (lower case c) as opposed to a Creationist. > The Creationist is a biblical lieralist-inerrantist who dupes the > scientifically illiterate with lies that sound like science. > > You should beware of the Hall of Mirrors trap however. > The path leading to it goes like this: > > Look at this watch I found! See it's intricate mechanism? > Just look at those tiny gears, the precision jewels, the delicate > balance wheel. Such a wonder could not have arisen by itself! > Thus without ever seeing him we can deduce the existence of a > watchmaker. > > Behold the watchmaker! See his clever hands, his intelligent mind, > capable of making this beautiful watch. Such a clever being could not > have arisen by himself! Thus without ever seeing him we deduce the > existence of a creating intelligence. > > But what of this creating intelligence? Capable of so cleverly guiding > evolution? Such a wondrous being cannot have arisen by himself! > Thus without ever seeing him we deduce the existence of a intelligent > creator creating intelligence. > > And what of this intelligent creator creating intelligence. Surely it > must have been created? > > Proposing a greater complexity to explain a complexity merely > postpones answering the problem NotsoQuick. It begs the question, > removing it a step without answering it. > > ## Never undertake vast schemes with half-vast methods. > Doesn't Occam's Razor demand that we explain all phenomena? It seems that evolution is over- simplified. And I must say that the science I have read so far would serve well as an answer to people who are seeking something to believe in to achieve a sense of order in the universe, and it seems to run as wide and deep as the dogma of organized religion.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |