
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 06:09:44 GMT, Ken Muldrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip> > Spiffy discussion, BTW. I should probably trim the followups to just sci.physics, but I don't know if I'll bother. > The beauty of the idea of "collective cognition" (analogous to > collective action) is that the more minds are involved in solving a > problem, the better the solution. What I want to do is get more people > thinking about the idea. Once that gets going then it will either > become obvious that it has to be implemented, or it will become > obvious why it cannot be implemented. I've read all the preceding posts, and I hope I have some inkling of your proposal. Let me see if I understand: 1) citizen of this political entity does their thing -- some kind of work, I suppose -- for a predetermined amount of decision making power 2) at regular times, the citizens who have some decision-credit get together to make laws and solve problems (or, perhaps, elect representatives or apppoint people to positions) 3) instead of money, this decision-making-credit is the stuff which is used in trade (?? I'm not sure on this) Am I completely off? I haven't got any scotch to help me along. (Which is just as well, I suspect. Wine will have to do.) -- - Laurel * * * http://amberdine.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |