
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (madiba) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > Mark Tarka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Anyone at all with a solution to the problem: > > brain injury due to a fall as opposed to an > > ischemic stroke -- is the answer correct -- > > "ischemic lesion looks (very) different to > > the bleeding caused by a [ischemic] stroke"? > Oh for Pete's sake it was a typo, get over it. > If it wasn't for that attitude of yours I would have corrected it sooner > It should read: > "the ischemic lesion looks (very) different to the bleeding caused by a > fall". Those were the only two lesions being compared in that question. Sorry, Oh Testy One, but that was a whopper of a typo. > Are all chemists so pedantic? No, and of those who are, only when hungry :-) Got any cites to the literature that'd confirm your statements? This is probably old business, for you, but it is new to me. I should be able to get to a library that'd have paper copies. Mark (The Pope, a radiologist, and a chemist, walk into a bar....)
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |