Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Sci Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Nardil, Parnate questions



In article<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Larry Brash
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>ohberg wrote:
>> 
>> Do these "older" anti-depressants ever work better than the newer SSRIs?
>> Would appreciate hearing from anyone with insight into this medication. I am
>> thinking of switching from a SSRI, and want to weigh the pros & cons.
>
>Despite all their well documented problems, these drugs have balls. 
>
>They increase the levels of all the transmitters that are metabolised 
>about MAOs i.e. noradrenaline, serotonin AND dopamine.

 Not all of them have much effect on Mono-Amine Oxidase(B)
 [i.e. on Dopamine].  Selegiline is better for this.
>
>Sometimes a double barreled pharmacological shotgun works wonders.

 Yes, but I wouldn't suggest messing with them outside
 professional supervision.



-- 
 FUCK THE SKULL OF HUBBARD,  AND BUGGER THE DWARF  HE RODE IN ON!!
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 8====3  (O 0)    GROETEN --- PRINTZ XEMU EXTRAWL   no real OT has
          |n|    (COMMANDER,  FIFTH INVADER FORCE)   ever existed 
 .................................................................
 A society without a religion is like a maniac without a chainsaw.



<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.