
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
That much energy comes just from putting his arms in? It couldent possibly take in the order of 100N to pull a couple of lousy 3kg weights into your sides could it? It seems to be the only explaination, certinly the first that I thought of, but I dismised it because it seemed so unreal. This is almost enough to get me into a bar, just to try it ;) Wouldent I be the life of the party! hehe! "Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Timtro wrote: > > > > I'm sorry to bother you all with this question. I was just playing around > > with a problem I found in a book. It is a simple problem where in a man sits > > on a stoll free to ratate without friction and is spun around while he holds > > two 3kg weights. we are given the moment of inertia of the man+stool, > > initial speed and the fact that the weights are 1m from the axis of > > rotation. The man then contracts his arms to 0.3m from the axis of rotation. > > Obviously the man will go faster because of this, but when I calculated the > > initial and final kinetic energies, they were VERY differant. Where did all > > that extra energy come from? Or did I calculate the energy wrong? > > The man had to do work to reel in the weights.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |