
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Mark Tarka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > > Well, you used the word "intent", that I was looking > for "intent", when all I wanted to know was if CT > could be a useful tool for distinguising between > stroke and "fall" injuries. Bottom line, what you are saying is that one excludes the other so your hypothetical can not be answered based on logic. You are saying a person who has a stroke can not fall. He must not have evidence of trauma either wise it is not a stroke. That premise is false so your hypothetical then becomes false. I would go into one of those spy stores and get remote listening or pin hole cams to monitor care if it is at all pertinent but then again it's a hypthetical???????
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |