Re: Dr. Wilton Krogman "wrote the book."

On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 12:38:30 +0000 (UTC), "Grinder"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>"nordskoven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Dr. Wilton Krogman literally "wrote the book" on anatomy,
>worked on
>> cases with law enforcement and not just in the ivy-covered
>halls of
>> academia, and did hands-on study of specimens discovered by
>Ed Conrad.
>> Dr. Wilton Krogman identified these as morphologically
>consistent with
>> human anatomy.
>
>There's been little dispute -- some of Ed's rocks are "shaped
>like" body parts.
>
>> It is anti-scientific to actively disregard evidence simply
>to support
>> a theory. No theory can discount evidence. Why pretend to the
>> scientific method when disregarding experts like Dr. Wilton
>Krogman?
>
>What did Dr. Krogman really have to say about this?  I've seen
>placards and usenet postings that quote him, but Dr. Krogman
>did not publish any of his oberservations concerning this
>astounding discovery.  Indeed, I've not even seen that Ed has
>posted any shakey digital photographs of Krogman's notes to
>him.  Ed's misrepresentation of the American Medical
>Laboratories reports would make me suspicious of further
>"documentation" of that sort, but I'd still like to see what
>Krogman has said.

==============================================
Mr. Grinder, will this do?
>
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petbone/MVC-007S.JPG
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petbone/MVC-008S.JPG
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petbone/MVC-009S.JPG
>
Ed Conrad
==============================================
>
>> This anomalous preservation of the Conrad specimens follows
>in the
>> continuum of bodies preserved in bogs with soft tissue
>intact. Rapid
>> interment is a given. Back-engineer from the evidence, don't
>front
>> load science by putting theories first. Take the pledge:
>facts first,
>> extrapolated truths second.
>
>