Re: compulsory pre-mortem dissection

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
 "Wayne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'm not sure if the troll you are talking about is me or my friend John de
> Rivaz.  You're not one of those sub-human pieces
> of filth who once did, or does now, sexually assault and dissect innocent,
> helpless dead people againt their will, are you?
> 
Dead people have no will. Anyway it is not the post mortem issue that is 
interesting or the basis of the debate with John. It is his contention 
that dead things can be 'brought back'. His inability to see this as an 
article of faith, rather than informed with sound science is a matter of 
amusement, but the annual amusement by John in massively x-posted 
threads has paled in u.p.a. so hence the inclusion of us in this thread 
was unwelcome, hence the x-poster is validly accused of trolling.

So I have removed us from the groups list.

Peter

-- 
Peter Ashby
School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Scotland
To assume that I speak for the University of Dundee is to be deluded.
Reverse the Spam and remove to email me.