
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Anth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Precisely, it's about risk and other factors - you can't just show what % > asbestos exposure would induce cancer in all mice. > Anth > No, but numbers still have meaning. If one person out of two died after working ten years in a dust clogged factory that would be very serious. And from what I gather that's about it. This definitely a bad career choice. It also means that if you spend one day a year in the same factory, your average life expectancy with respect to asbestos induced cancer would be 5000 years. In other words, it would add about 1% to my chance of dying any given time period. It sounds like something to avoid but I wouldn't get panic struck if it happened to me once and was unlikely to be repeated. Walking across a heap of dust would be like 1 minute. If this happened once a year, my life expectancy would be 2,400,000 years. I'm afraid that is rather far beyond my planning horizon. My chances of getting hit by a car while walking down the street are a lot higher. It's worthwhile having a sense of proportion.with your worries. I put the hazard of walking across a plaster/asbestos pile about the same as jay walking downtown, more than walking across the street in my neighbourhood but a lot less than running across the freeway. By-the-way, the probability of getting a fine jaywalking has a bigger influence on my decisions than the probability of getting hit by a car. I do not worry about bogey men anymore. Much. Walter.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |