
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >
> > > Docket number for the rico complaint. Date filed. What court? What
> > > judge was assigned? Who is the plaintiff? Where is the class action
> > > certification? Where are the class action notices? When were the
> > > defendants served with the complaint?
> > >
> > > Put up or shut up FRAUDS!
> >
> > The Department of Justice is headed by the United States Attorney
> > General. It is the legal enforcement arm of the executive branch of
> > government.(the Bush administration).
> >
> > Typically, they would probably be expected to receive what K claims to
> > have forwarded to them, and investigate, consider what further action,
> > if any, is necessary. DOJ attorneys will make this decision.
>
> They have places to file ravings of kooks. Not with the court either.
>
> >
> > In other words, it is up to DOJ whether a "case" ever gets filed or
> > not...whether it is based on the RICO statute or any other.
>
> Individuals can file civil rico cases on their own. Not like the
> insane ravings of kathleen.
>
> You're right that the DOJ are the only ones to file criminal rico
> cases.
>
> This isn't one. This isn't a civil rico case either. This is the
> ravings of a lunatic.
>
> > There is no "complaint" in the traditional sense, until a "case" is
> > filed. The "complaint" lays out the specifics of the charges.
>
> Not kathleen's hand written ravings complete with little hand drawn
> arrows. Kathleen is confusing her complaining with the concept of a
> legal complaint which is a document filed with the court which gets a
> docket number and gets served on defendants and summarizes the basis
> of a lawsuit. It is the document that starts the case.
>
>
> > By definition...there is no "case". No "complaint" has been filed.
> > There is no "RICO" action currently pending.
>
> That is absolutely right.
>
> There is not never was and never will be a rico case.
>
> > Here, there has only been a letter "complaining"...an entirely
> > different matter.
>
> Right Complaining raving yes whatever you wish to call it. But it is
> not a rico case.
>
> > As K. has been told by her own attorneys...there are no precedents for
> > this application of the RICO statute...therefore, it is highly
> > unlikely that DOJ would even consider such an action.
>
> Highly unlikely? LOL How bout hell will freeze over first.
>
> > In additon, the letter K. forwarded to them names two government
> > agencies which are arms of the current administration.
>
> And doesn't name the predicate statutory acts under the rico law
> needed to make an actual rico complaint.
>
> > Only the most incredibly politically naive would expect action to be
> > taken under those circumstances.
>
> Not only politically naive but legally ignorant and raving lunatic.
>
> Kathleen is a fraud. Her sidekick lisa is a bitch on wheels. Sick
> kooks both of them. Birds of a raving feather.
>
> Where is der dritte mann when we need him to talk a little truth?
=========
You blew it McSweegan.
The Chronically Infamous Whistleblower, Que Tam Boy,
just blew the whistle on mimself and John G. Rowland.
http://www.actionlyme.com/BRAINLESS_BUREAUCRATS.htm
http://www.actionlyme.com/duhDCF.htm
McSweegan and NeuroPsychiatric Disease:
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol4no1/adobe/letters.pdf
"INFECTIOUS DISEASE AND MENTAL ILLNESS: IS THERE A LINK?"
- By Edward McSweeghan
RARE DISEASES CONFERENCE:
McSweegan writes about how these infections affect the brain:
http://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/html/workshops/workshops/infectiousdiseases19970917.html
Check out McSweegan, listed as a member of the WorkGroup, as is Fauci
(who also lied to the Public on CNN about the Lyme vaccine
http://www.actionlyme.com/The_Fauci_Files.htm
1997 and McSweegan and Fauci RARE DISEASES:
"The variety of insect-borne diseases include dengue, Hantaviruses,
mosquito-borne viral encephalitides, ehrlichioses, baronelloses,
rickettsioses, Lyme borreliosis, Chagas' disease and leishmaniasis."
[Chagas is a trypanosomiasis—Antigenic Variation- KMD]
McSweegan. The arrows are all over the October 4, 2003
data package to Blumenthal and the USDOJ, which the DCF
got ahold of, somehow.
I thought it was one of my more excellent explainers.
I drew out what was Chromoatography.
It's the Chromatography business that is the key to the
Cryme: WEINSTEIN'S BOGUS VALIDATION, and his new invention
for a "detector"
http://www.actionlyme.com/CONNOLLY_FISH_WEINSTEIN.htm
"A Western blot of serum from a patient with
Lyme arthritis and the corresponding intensity
of
each band. Band positions and intensities are
calculated using a computerized image analysis
system developed by Krzysztof Kowal, Ph.D.,
and Arthur Weinstein, M.D. They conclude from
their research that this analysis increases
the
objectivity and accuracy of Western blot
interpretation for the diagnosis of Lyme
arthritis. "
FALSE.
http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/cmc3.pdf
Kathleen
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |