Re: McWeisman u nut, YOU are the one who said u have no lyme

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lisam01502) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Weisman (aka "Dr." Ed McSweegan) you nut, you ask who said you don't have Lyme?
> YOU did. In message 21, on 29 Nov 2003, in the thread called " Titanium
> spikes... .".
> 
> Greg has written this:
> 
> > Do you think your incessant harassment helps?
> > Do you really have Lyme Disease?
> 
> And this was your reply , Weisman aka McSweegan aka FOS (Filthy old Swine):
> 
> "I have a right to comment on their nonsense. They are the ones who
> harass. Kathleen has harassed everyone who is ccd on her raveograms.
> 
> Do I really have Lyme disease? Why do you ask. Aren't people who don't
> have Lyme allowed to comment. Let me check the rules here. Oh--there
> are no rules. Bug off greg."
> 
> Now what will this pathetic middle-aged fraudster do. Say he does have Lyme
> really,but he has such severe memory deficits, that he forgot he had Lyme?

Lisa is your reading comprehension really so poor that you think that
the above constitutes my "admission" that I don't have Lyme Disease?

Because it doesn't say that. It doesn't say I do or don't.

Would you like to know why? 

Because that is none of your business nor "greg hanson"'s business
either.

If I CHOOSE to share that information, I will. If I CHOOSE not to
share it, I won't.

You are the last person on earth who I would share any personal
information with.

What the quoted words mean is that it is my opinion that there is no
requirement that someone have Lyme disease in order to comment on
topics posted on usenet.

Are you really this stupid or do you just play someone this stupid on
the internet? (same question but substitute "hostile" for stupid and
substitute "bitchy" and "insane" etc for stupid).

 
> In future, McSwindler,  can I suggest you buy yourself a pen and a little
> notebook, ideally one with alphabetical index, and write down each lie you
> publish.

I am too busy writing down all the LIES that you and kathleen tell but
thanks for your kind suggestion you hostile bitch.

>That will help you to remember which lies you have told us, so you
> won't get confused and make such a oig's ass of yourself in public again..


I shouldn't ask but I can't help it.

What is an "oig"?

> On second thoughts, McSweegan, you need more than one little notebook. You need
> to contact a wholesale stationers, and invest in a whole warehouse full of
> notebooks.

No YOU do.
 
> How much public money are you being paid again to sit at your computer and
> harass Lyme patients and discredit Lyme activists, honest scientists and
> doctors? Oh yeah. $100 000 , wasn't it.

Is Burrascano paying YOU? Is Liegner? Or ILADS? Come on fess up. No
one would waste their time doing this for free. Please tell Joe
Burrascano he is wasting his money. Or is that money coming from his
legal defense fund, meaning the patients are paying him on top of his
huge outrageous fees? Huh?

For the last time, I'm NOT McSweegan. And even if I was, so what? Do
you think attacking people instead of responding to WHAT they say
makes for persuasive argument or discussion? (It doesn't).

Why don't you answer some of the many unanswered questions that have
been posed to you? About YOUR LIES.

Now for the record I am going to say that I do not agree with allan
steere or the conservative view of Lyme disease. I agree with what
anna has said to Greg Gerber. None of us dispute that the tests are
bad and unreliable. None of us dispute that the vaccine sucked. None
of us dispute that some people don't get diagnosed or treated
properly.

But that doesn't mean we agree with you and kathleen and your ravings.

None of what is going on is a crime. It is NOT rico. It is not fraud
in a legal sense. There is no conspiracy. The case against kathleen
has NOTHING to do with her being a Lyme advocate or a human rights
activist or whatever she thinks she is doing.

Now stop your silly nonsense and go check yourself in to a mental
institutition. You and kathleen can have adjoining rubber rooms.
 
> Somebody want to call the NIH?

What would you like us to call the NIH? 
 
> Or get your local congressmen to call
> .: )))
> Lisa

Lisa you stupid whore go f yourself!