
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Lisa and Kathleen: I certainly sympathized about the vicious circle you described. People fighting CPS have learned a lot about medical misinformation inside and outside of the medical field itself. In several arenas the effects of this MISINFORMATION have lead to a parent being sent to prison, in many others, children were removed from their homes forever. It is to Child Protection a bit like what DNA has shown about a number on death row. Not only vindication, but proof the system IS BROKEN. All of the checks and balances HAVE FAILED MISERABLY. Caseworkers, ER nurses and Doctors STILL think that spiral fractures indicate child abuse. Information available since 1997 shows that at LEAST 90% of all spiral fractures are in fact NOT child abuse. The most grim part of one study revealed a group of 28 children (out of a 128 sample) were removed from their families FOREVER and all were later found to have bone diseases that should have exonerated the parents. The myth that spiral factures==child abuse is still perpetrated to this day, even though it has been disproven. I would even go so far as to argue that spiral fractures should no longer be considered PROBABLE CAUSE of child abuse, since 9 out of ten times it is NOT. The burden of PROOF need to severely shift on this one! The old CPS standby of PRESUMED GUILTY needs to stop certainly. Some of you Lyme people know about how readily Munchausen and Munchausen by Proxy gets tossed around. Caseworkers take a training seminar on ritual child abuse and the next thing you know they have a whole town charged for ritual child abuse. (Wenatchee) Caseworkers watch an NBC or ABC "Movie of the Week" about something ""exciting"" like Munchausens and the next thing you know they see it hiding in every shadow. To tell you the truth, I don't know which is worse, medical people who APPEAR to be authoritative and through the uneducated caseworkers result in harm, or the uneducated caseworkers who have such AWESOME power and are made legally not accountable for their major screwups. Sometimes the flow starts with the caseworkers, going to the so-called professionals to confirm their sick fertive imaginings. When this comes to physical exams there have been some, but fewer problems with ""suggestability"" of doctors. But when caseworkers send somebody to get a Psychological Evaluation at a psychologist, there is a distrubing number of cases where psychologists are simply yielding to the ""suggestions"" from the unskilled caseworkers. As I mentioned elsewhere, I was a Mortician's kid. My father and I saw first hand a few arrogant doctors with "God Complexes". Some of them get really carried away, grooving on their power trip in a hospital. "Stat!" etc... But my Dad buried quite a few of their mistakes. Occasionally he even discovered what the ME could not find, after making a considerable mess. Sometimes embalming reveals cardiovascular blockages. Somewhere in my toolbox, among my electronic tools, is a pair of hemostats that arrived in somebody. Long since sterilized of course. Those hemostats will forever be my symbol of the fallibility of doctors. Just like with lawyers, people need to walk a fine line between believing everything the pro tells them and second guessing. Too much second guessing can make you a complete pain in the butt, and hurt you. Not enough second guessing can hurt you also. Here in Iowa, it has become a new summer tradition for the news media to report cases of West Nile virus. The number of cases, locations and death toll are becoming a fixture in Television news. Mosquito Control has become a big deal. With our overpopulation of white tail deer, we have heard a lot about avoiding ticks, especially deer ticks. Is that the main vector for Lyme? Are we in a hot zone for Lyme Disease? Wise Man: Do you have Lyme disease? I would think that if you did, you would be a bit more hospitable to such statements and questions. If you DON'T, then what are your motivations? [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lisam01502) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > >Is this disease truly limited to certain > >regions or is it just undetected in others? > > Regions where Lyme is "rare" are often the victim > of a vicious circle in which physicians are told > it's rare in their area, so they do not consider > it in their differential diagnosis. So for example, > they may then slip into a habit of diagnosing > dozens of "brown recluse spider bites", "ringworm" > cases etc etc, which are in reality EM, simply out > of habit and because that is what other local > physicians, subject to the same misinformation, > are doing. > > Add into that the fact that in the unlikely event > that they do diagnose a case of Lyme against the > official "wisdom" that insists the area is > Lyme-free, they will ship blood off to a lab that > likely uses the kind of faulty testing > protocols set up by Steere and co. > > When these tests come back (falsely) negative, > are they likely to challenge them? And are they > likely to pursue the possibility of seronegative Lyme? > Only an exceptionally knowledgeable (and ethical) > doctor would. Then the harassment kicks in - > threats, visits from the OPMC, slanderous > accusations. > > Think about it - do birds, covered with Lyme ticks, > consult little maps under their wings, and then > call to each other - "Hey Tweety, take a left at > the next mountain range will ya? We can't stop here, > it's a CDC (or Eucalb) - designated > Lyme -non-endemic area!" > Lisa
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |