Re: cytoluminescent therapy

Lbucc wrote:

> It might have been nice if you had provided this response to start with

Lots of things might be nice Lisa, like me being perfect.
Like someone else replying to posts on the other newsgroup.
Like me not being tired and exasperated and not finding that link until after the
fact.
Like someone (anyone, lots of) taking the time to run searches and post helpful
links.
Like Peter Moran having been here to reply before I did. (who by the way, echoed my
concerns).
Like me not replying at all to the original post.

And that's essentially what I've decided.
Someone else can "do the work".

It's not like your newsgroup, Lisa where most are "chronic" for quite a number of
years and all basically have the same cancer (breast), and all mostly take the same
(similar) chemos and treatments. So for any one post, there's usually at least 2 or
3 replies.
ASC can have all kinds of cancers, it's more complicated and is the target of said
spammers, conspiracists, nutcases, etc.

It's so easy to sit back and sit in judgement of me, isn't it?
J