Re: JSH: Not even close

James Harris wrote:

> What makes the story here *extremely* pathetic is that

...you might actually do something useful with your life if
you'd get some counseling and maybe some medication, but
that's not likely to happen.

> mathematicians
> can't in *any* way approach what I showed you in going from a partial
> difference equation that counts primes, as they don't have one, to a
> continuous function.

Since this has been proven false many time, I can only
guess that your plan is to repeat it so many times that everyone
will get bored and stop responding, at which point you'll
declare victory.

> If they can, I'd like to see *anyone* post a demoonstration like mine.

Sane people realize that the only differences between
your method and the Legendre method
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LegendresFormula.html
are notational.

> I wouldn't be surprised if rank and arrogant posters try to attack
> that posting, but pay careful attention to what they say, and
> remember, despite it's gloried history, nothing even close to that has
> been possible with anything that mathematicians have discovered that
> counts primes in recorded human history.

Since this has been proven false many time, I can only
guess that your plan is to repeat it so many times that everyone
will get bored and stop responding, at which point you'll
declare victory.

> That more than anything else is what you can use to realize that I
> have a first-find and a significant one, as nothing they have can
> approach what can be done with my discovery.

And what would that be, exactly?  You seem to have a
greatly inflated view of the importance of prime
counting algorithms in the overall scheme of things.


> Mathematicians are here flat on their backs and not even in the
> ballpark.
>
> So why would they fight such a discovery?
>
> Good question.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Mathematicians aren't even close, yet they keep posturing and fighting
> against mathematics itself.
>
> If they continue, mathematics will destroy them.

Did I mention there are good medications on the market
these days?

-E


> Isn't that ironic, don't you think?
>
>
> James Harris