Re: Logic missing from "Proofs from THE BOOK"

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 12/01/2003
   at 08:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

>It is?  Surely the cohomology (or cohomologies) of projective spaces
>of finite fields is central to their study?

Algebraic Geometry is not Topology. Which is not to say that methods
and results of one are not useful in the other, but they are distinct
fields. The same words occur in both fields with very different
meanings.

-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT

Unsolicited bulk E-mail will be subject to legal action.  I reserve
the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail.

Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me.  Do
not reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]