Re: Reasonable C++ matrix library

Djalil CHAFAI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> <posté comme article et comme courrier>
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
>> MTL is a quite comprehensive library:
>> <http://www.osl.iu.edu/research/mtl/>
>> Another alternative is LAPACK++, but it's quite old, and may not compile
>> <http://math.nist.gov/lapack++/>
>> Newmat is yet another package:
>> <http://www.robertnz.net/nm_intro.htm>
>> I could go on, but instead I'll just refer you this this index:
>> <http://www.netlib.org/utk/people/JackDongarra/la-sw.html>
> 
> Thanks for this last URL. Is there some serious technical/performance
> comparison of the main C++ libs for linalg somewere? I wasn't able to find
> anything uptodate and relevant. 

Not that I know of. But many of the libraries (MTL, uBLAS and others) have
compared themselves against either Fortran codes or other C/C++ codes.
Check their homepages for papers.

Also, there is a survey of iterative solvers (which includes C++ packages):

 <http://www.netlib.org/utk/papers/iterative-survey/>

While it's somewhat old, many of the packages included are still relevant.

-- 
Bjørn-Ove Heimsund
Centre for Integrated Petroleum Research
University of Bergen, Norway