
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Christensen) wrote > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Charlie-Boo) wrote > > "Dan Christensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > ZF and various other axiomitizations of set theory attempt to define > > sets in a way that that meets these two needs (completeness without > > contradiction.) Do you really have a solution to that problem? > > I'm not sure. Maybe. > > Dan Then how do you define which sets exist and how do you avoid contradiction? Charlie Volkstorf
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |