Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Sci Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: better absorption from organic minerals, any evidence ?



In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
William A. Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>"mark boucher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Is it true that inorganic minerals like *calcium carbonate* which is
>> basically, ground up rocks, can not be absorbed ? ( i know that
>> calcium carbonate is not the prefered form of calcium anyway, as it
>> contains the highest lead content of all, if memory serves me).
>
>If my memory serves and the source I read was accurate, the lead in
>milk was the "best" absorbed form:-) therefore don't assume milk
>is a better source of Ca.

In any event, it's not calcium carbonate that was accompanied by
excessive amounts of lead; the only calcium supplements I know of
that needed to "get the lead out" were dolomite and bone meal.

  -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net 
     These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
       "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
           were standing on my shoulders."  (Hal Abelson, MIT)






<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.