
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Peter T. Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Neither of those is appropriate. You want "spy," "secret agent," > > "infiltrator," "decoy," "wolf in sheep's clothing," etc. (That's what > > thesauruses are good for.) > > -- > > Peter T. Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <Secret agent> would be closest to what I was thinking, but this is a known > entity. I am looking for an unproven case such as a <mole> in the sense of > a deception or propaganda supplier. > > The example that prompted this search was someone calling Schwarzeneggar a > 'confederate', meaning that he appears like a conservative but in fact has > been legislating leftist acts. Another example, with or without factuality, > was someone saying online that Menachim Begin created one of the militant > Palestinian groups in order to give ordinary Palestinians the desire for > peace. > > So what word, here, would you use to describe the militant group as well as > Arnold? How about 'duplicitous/duplicity'? From MW11: "1 : contradictory doubleness of thought, speech, or action; especially : the belying of one's true intentions by deceptive words or action 2 : the quality or state of being double or twofold" Carl Taylor
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |