
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Richard Herring wrote: > Thai has no verb "to be" ;-) Well, well, well :-) this brings us to "is lack of 'to be' irregular"? I know lots of languages that don't have a verb 'to be', nor 'to have'. In fact, thinking back... 1970... yes, when I was scouring beautiful downtown Espiritu Santo (well, downtown was restricted to Luganville, but a fine place it was) no... let me rephrase that... scouring beautiful uptown Mafea, Aore, Lorediakarkar and so on for Swadesh wordlists, not one, not one of those %$@@## languages had a 'to be' or even a miserly 'to have'. Alas, poor Yorick. The miserable fuckers had no question about it! Aarrgggh!
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |