Re: Smoothing?

Final pester i promise :p

Have i said thankyou for all your help by the way???

if not...thankyou very much for your time and paitience.

Can we just go back to the origanal edge detector.....

// allocate working array
double* pWork = new double [my_image.width * my_image.length];

why the pointer?? couldn't you use a standard array and force the data
from a double to an int?


As i said thx again

"Roger Rowland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Maybe -
> 
> "Image Processing, Analysis and Machine Vision"
> Milan Sonka, Vaclaw Hlavac & Roger Boyle
> ISBN 0-534-95393-X
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> EMail: roger dot rowland at rmrsystems dot co dot uk
> "DaveWilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I think i'm gonna need a good book on this after all :p
> >
> > Any sugestions???
> >
> >
> > "Roger Rowland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>  news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > "DaveWilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > so if that code uses the low pass filter (1 1 1) (1 1 1) (1 1 1)
> > > > smooths
> > > > why doesn't (0 1 0) (1 -4 1) (0 1 0) sharpen the image? according to
> > > > sources i've found that filter applied in the same manner should
> > > > sharpen an image?
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Except that it isn't applied in the same manner. The scaled result of
>  the
> > > high-pass filter should be *added back* to the original pixel value at
>  that
> > > position to sharpen the image. In the previous examples, the output of
>  the
> > > filter *replaces* the original value.
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------
> > > EMail: roger dot rowland at rmrsystems dot co dot uk