
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In sci.image.processing Dave Martindale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I'd guess that Hamming and Hanning windows of the same width as a
> particular Lanczos window would probably work quite well.
I found this:
http://www.cg.tuwien.ac.at/research/vis/vismed/Windows/MasteringWindows.pdf
Looking at the frequency response curves, Lanczos seems to be well
behaved. However, the response of the Hamming window is very similar
so I imagine it'd be hard to tell the difference in most cases.
Still, I guess one might as well use Lanczos as it's no more expensive
to compute.
"Turkowski [16] used windowed sinc functions for image resampling. He
found the Lanczos window superior in terms of reduction of aliasing,
sharpness, and minimal ringing as conclusion of an empirical
experiment.
"[16] Turkowski. Filters for common resampling tasks. In Andrew
S. Glassner, editor, Graphics Gems I, pages 147{165. Academic Press,
1990."
So, I guess that's the answer.
Andrew.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |