Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Sci Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Phosphate mining





jacques jedwab wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Please, in regard to phosphate mining and how it is affecting the
environment in the Gulf of Mexico, specifically, the west coast of
Florida and Louisianna: When the uses of phosphate are mentioned
"they" always say they use it for fertilizer and "other" uses.... Don't those "other" uses include explosives and neuclear weapons? Is
that the real reason WHY the powers that be allow the descruction of
our beautiful coast, land, water supply and contaminate the air? I
read an article in the Carnegie Report that said last month over 20
tons of phosphate was delivered to North Korea! Would a scientic
expert, please, care to post a comment? As is the case with petroleum
is phosphate also more about.... follow the money?
Thank you.


These questions reflect the prevailing abysmal holding in disgust of ALL
mining and chemical activities.


J.J.

Hi Jacques!


It is the lack of educational balance which promotes the poster's question, as well as the polarization of enviromentalists vs industrialists in the States. Modern people have very little clue where the benefits of their modern lifestyle come from, and that there is a price for that. On the other hand, people want products cheaply, so the mineral/chemical companies do not feel they can afford to do any but the required minimum in environmental compliance and restoration after a resource is exploited and so forth. These standards are much lower in the States than in Europe. It is what drives a company to the cheapest and usually worst operating practice, which brings out the screaming and placard waving locals and environmentalists on the other side, instead of requiring slightly more expensive methods of mining, resulting in higher prices,(which should be gladly paid by the same environmental-professing folks) but more preservation of the land, and a better stewardship ethic all around.

We seem incapable of the longer view here by working together instead of at short-sighted cross-purposes. Phosphate mining is often in conflict with local groundwater resources (furnishes local drinking water) and the tourist industry in north Florida. This is a political powderkeg.

Perhaps the poster should work towards viable compromise, instead of citing statistics. Twenty tons of anything isn't very much in the big picture.
best,
Jo




--
Geo Communications Services -- www.geocommunications.net
Jo Schaper's Missouri World -- http://www.missouriworld.net




<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.