
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"don findlay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > "don findlay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > "George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > > > > > When I read some real science on your web site, I'll let you know. > > > > > > "*Real* science"? What's that George? You mean the science that > > > begins with the observations of other people. People you can refer to > > > and make lists of? Lots of references, is that what you like? And > > > what you think makes science 'real'? > > > > No. That makes it credible. That's your problem - no credibility > > whatsoever. Your web site contains no math, no numbers, no charts, no > > statistics, no literature review, and no references. Just colorful drawings > > and a lot of bad-mouthing those with whom you disagree. And you think that > > makes you credible? That's what happens when a burned out field technician > > conducts shoddy research and then trys to spin it as science . Its kind of > > like a janitor trying to operate a particle accelerator. I think you should > > go back to school and learn how to do technical writing. What you write is > > very unprofessional, to say the least. > > > > You have stated in the past that you don't publish anything in professional > > papers because you don't like agree with publishing methods, etc. I think > > you don't publish in professional papers anymore, and post this crap on the > > internet because no one will touch it. And they shouldn't. Why? Because > > it is unprofessionally compiled, poorly written, contains unsubstantiated > > and/or erroneous information, and as written, is unverifiable. It is, > > however, certifiable. And so are you. But you've heard this all before, > > right? > > PS. It was Powerpoint - (not pdf). For slides. That you can show to > a thousand people at a time, rather than vicariously read. Late at > night. On your own. Do they get a laugh from it as well? I can imagine the roar in the lecture hall. > > _________________________________________________________________________ > > Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different > > results - Albert Einstein > > Why do you keep objecting George. Why don't you just accept the fait > accompli? Hahaha. Oh, by the way, my wife also read your web site (she is also a geologist). She too had a good laugh.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |