Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Sci Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Usama Bin Boudin tries harder



"don findlay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > "don findlay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > "George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > >
> > > > When I read some real science on your web site, I'll let you know.
> > >
> > > "*Real* science"?   What's that George?  You mean the science that
> > > begins with the observations of other people.  People you can refer to
> > > and make lists of?  Lots of references, is that what you like?  And
> > > what you think makes science 'real'?
> >
> > No.  That makes it credible.  That's your problem - no credibility
> > whatsoever.  Your web site contains no math, no numbers, no charts, no
> > statistics, no literature review, and no references.  Just colorful
drawings
> > and a lot of bad-mouthing those with whom you disagree.  And you think
that
> > makes you credible?  That's what happens when a burned out field
technician
> > conducts shoddy research and then trys to spin it as science .  Its kind
of
> > like a janitor trying to operate a particle accelerator.  I think you
should
> > go back to school and learn how to do technical writing.  What you write
is
> > very unprofessional, to say the least.
> >
> > You have stated in the past that you don't publish anything in
professional
> > papers because you don't like agree with publishing methods, etc.  I
think
> > you don't publish in professional papers anymore, and post this crap on
the
> > internet because no one will touch it.  And they shouldn't.  Why?
Because
> > it is unprofessionally compiled, poorly written, contains
unsubstantiated
> > and/or erroneous information, and as written, is unverifiable.  It is,
> > however, certifiable.  And so are you.  But you've heard this all
before,
> > right?
>
> PS.  It was Powerpoint - (not pdf).  For slides. That you can show to
> a thousand people at a time, rather than vicariously read.  Late at
> night.  On your own.

Do they get a laugh from it as well?  I can imagine the roar in the lecture
hall.

> >
_________________________________________________________________________
> > Insanity:  Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting
different
> > results - Albert Einstein
>
> Why do you keep objecting George.  Why don't you just accept the fait
> accompli?

Hahaha.  Oh, by the way, my wife also read your web site (she is also a
geologist).  She too had a good laugh.





<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.