Re: Usama Bin Boudin tries harder

"George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> "don findlay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >
> > > When I read some real science on your web site, I'll let you know.
> >
> > "*Real* science"?   What's that George?  You mean the science that
> > begins with the observations of other people.  People you can refer to
> > and make lists of?  Lots of references, is that what you like?  And
> > what you think makes science 'real'?
> 
> No.  That makes it credible.  That's your problem - no credibility
> whatsoever.  Your web site contains no math, no numbers, no charts, no
> statistics, no literature review, and no references.  Just colorful drawings
> and a lot of bad-mouthing those with whom you disagree.  And you think that
> makes you credible?  That's what happens when a burned out field technician
> conducts shoddy research and then trys to spin it as science .  Its kind of
> like a janitor trying to operate a particle accelerator.  I think you should
> go back to school and learn how to do technical writing.  What you write is
> very unprofessional, to say the least.
> 
> You have stated in the past that you don't publish anything in professional
> papers because you don't like agree with publishing methods, etc.  I think
> you don't publish in professional papers anymore, and post this crap on the
> internet because no one will touch it.  And they shouldn't.  Why?  Because
> it is unprofessionally compiled, poorly written, contains unsubstantiated
> and/or erroneous information, and as written, is unverifiable.  It is,
> however, certifiable.  And so are you.  But you've heard this all before,
> right?

PS.  It was Powerpoint - (not pdf).  For slides. That you can show to
a thousand people at a time, rather than vicariously read.  Late at
night.  On your own.

> _________________________________________________________________________
> Insanity:  Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different
> results - Albert Einstein

Why do you keep objecting George.  Why don't you just accept the fait
accompli?