
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
J. Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > On 24 Nov 2003 15:03:57 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (don findlay) wrote: > > >at:- > > > >http://users.indigo.net.au/don/ee/palimp_persia.html > >http://users.indigo.net.au/don/ee/palimpaf_ant.html > >http://users.indigo.net.au/don/ee/pangondwana.html > >http://users.indigo.net.au/don/ee/pandispersion.html > > > >df. > > Excellent work! Maybe one day they will wake up and see it is > literally impossible all the continental margins can match up and all > the fractures can be followed back if the radius of the Earth was not > smaller. Keep up the good work. It is all independently verifiable > if any dare to just DO IT! > > JT It's amazing isn't it? For a hundred years, people work at finding out how the continental crust deforms, ...brittle structures, ductile structures, faults folds, everything under the sun, and every size, and then, having recognised that the crust has pulled apart on a huge scale, they balk, ...they forget everything they ever learned, and treat the continents like immutable shapes that come out of a jigsaw box. They think they can fit them together as if they were grey featureless masses. They might not have ever learned any geology at all, for all the good it has done them. Geophysicists have to be the worst. They refuse to acknowledge (and question)the basic assumption on which everything is based, and which they would see is patently flawed if they were the slightest bit geologically competent. Instead they dwell in the 'what if' neverland fantasy of subduction. For no other reason that it suits the machinations of numbers, and the 'what if' axioms that typically predicate their convolutions. To them, the geology might as well be a featureless mass. *Is a featureless mass. It is irrelevant to them. They have set back progress in Earth Siences (and probably a fair bit in astronophysics as well) a good half-century. Used public funding to do it. And declared it a bonus. Would you buy a used car from these people, much less an education? They're a joke. A great big Joke. Plate tectonics is a concept every bit as laughable as pre-Copernican astronomy, and with a high degree of similarity. The only big difference is in the several hundred years that separate them. The mistakes are exactly the same - flawed assumptions elevated to ecclesiastical status, and promulgated by popes. Ha. Ha. Ha. df.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |