
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
>Subject: Re: Northridge Anniversary Coming Up in January >From: "Michael Mcneil" [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: 11/27/2003 11:45 PM Pacific Standard Time >Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >"Felix Tilley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> January 17, 2004 will be the tenth anniversary of the Northridge >> earthquake. >> >> I just wanted to remind you. >> >> Felix in Baja Phoenix (Tucson) >One gets the impression that some here would rather only discuss that >event and perhaps one or two others. > >And there has been a lapse so that you presented a timely reminder to >gather your troops. > >I do hope that this news group was not specifically created for that >purpose. > Hey, weatherlawyer! Go easy, here! I think your evident paranoia about a conspiracy to limit chit-chat to a few certain quakes is not viable, nor does it sound entirely the product of a sane mind. I've seen all kinds of quakes discussed here, even 1.5 and 1.9 mag. microtremors. Furthermore, I see nothing untoward about Mr.Tilley's looking forward to the 10-year anniversary of one of the most damaging quakes to hit Southern California in the 20th Century, in fact, I appreciate his sentiments. I feel he must have personally been involved, or knew some people who were victims and survivors of that quake, and he himself may have felt it, even if from afar.. All of which affected him SO deeply that now, 10 year later, he still recalls that frightful early morning, and longs to hear others who may have been there, express the same thoughts and feelings. This also makes me respect him more as a human being. Weatherlawyer, please don't abuse his memory for an earthquake that affected him, and others, so deeply. Aren't you in Kansas or someplace? Shouldn't you be keeping a weather eye out for cirrus clouds that might indicate a tsunami somewhere? I was GOING to say, "You know how earthquake enthusiasts and geologists are, they're the first to get all sedimental!" but decided it wouldn't be quite proper! P.S., Northridge is in the San Fernando Valley, which has at least 3 dedicated Chihuahua lovers. Please see the following: http://chihuahua.meetup.com/members/514 LONDON NOT KEEN ON CHIHUAHUAS Looking at the statistics in the above list, one sees that only EIGHT Chihuahua lovers are willing to show themselves in London, England, whereas San Diego, California, a city of about a TENTH the population of London, has 113 Chihuahua lovers; New York City has 91, and Santa Clara County, California, is not far behind with 67. England needs to get more chihuahuas! Best to all, -----e.a. http://www.geocities.com/ed_augusts/mypage.html >-- >Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG > > > > > >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |