Re: seismology and solar flare prediction

In article 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
 "The Pied Piper of Evil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Wally Anglesea™ wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 17:49:28 +0000 (UTC), "Michael Mcneil" 
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >"Timberwoof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 
> > >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> That's pretty interesting. I've never heard of these objections. 
> > >> Could you explain the Doppler theory and why you doubt it so 
> > >> much?

<snip irrelevant ramblings>

> >
> >
> > oOthing of which explains why you doubt Doppler shift.
> 
> It seems that the Jezus Freak hasn't ever paid enough attention to 
> ANY moving object as it passed his location.
> 
> Let's bring him up to date, shall we? I'll begin.
> 
> Oi! Jeezus Boi! Ever notice the change in tone of an object as it 
> passes your location? Maybe that's too contemporary for you... Let's 
> try this:
> 
> Pommie 1:1 Hark! Hast thou taken notice of the change in the sound of 
> the train whistle as it passes before thee whilst thou awaiteth at 
> the crossing? Rejoice! The change in the sound be the Doppler Effect! 
> The Lord hath made it so. The Lord hath also dictated that the same 
> effect shall hold true for light as well as sound.
> 
> Pommie 1:2 Thou art a snapperhead weatherlawyer. Thou art also a 
> spammer and will thustly pay for your usenet abuses. Thou art off 
> topic in so many ways you make other kooks look like literary and 
> scientific miracle workers.

Piper, be careful, lest you appear to be adding to the Bible, which is a 
Bad Thing. 

Michael Mcneil, I am interested in some of what you have to say. Could 
you please explain the Doppler theory and why you doubt it so much? And 
while doing so, would you please stay on that topic?

-- 
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com